Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schutte, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Practice and Process in Wraparound Teamwork

Janet S. Walker

Regional Research Institute for Human Services, janetw{at}pdx.edu

Kathryn M. Schutte

Research and Training Center on Family Support and ChildrenCaractère manquant ?s Mental Health

Collaborative family—provider teams have become an increasingly popular mechanism for creating and implementing individualized service and support plans for children and families with complex needs. In the context of children's mental health,this type of individualized service planning is most often known as wraparound, and it has become one of the primary strategies for implementing the system of care philosophy. A consensus has been reached about the values that underlie wraparound; however, less agreement exists regarding the specific techniques or procedures that translate the value base into practices at the team level. Difficulties in reaching agreement about guidelines or standards for wraparound practice are exacerbated by the lack of a theory describing how the wraparound process produces positive outcomes. This article brings together theory and research from a variety of sources in proposing a model of effectiveness for wraparound. The model specifies relationships between team practices, processes, and outcomes. The model is then used as a basis for recommending specific practices for wraparound teamwork.

Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 12, No. 3, 182-192 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/10634266040120030501
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Positive Behavior InterventionsHome page
B. Walker, D. Cheney, and S. Stage
The Validity and Reliability of the Self-Assessment and Program Review: Assessing School Progress in Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 94 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
J. A. Anderson, E. R. Wright, K. Kelley, and H. Kooreman
Patterns of Clinical Functioning Over Time for Young People Served in a System of Care
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, June 1, 2008; 16(2): 90 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J. S. Walker and E. J. Bruns
Building on Practice-Based Evidence: Using Expert Perspectives to Define the Wraparound Process
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2006; 57(11): 1579 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]