Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 15, No. 1, 3-20 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/10634266070150010201

How Do Different Types of High School Students Respond to Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support Programs?

Characteristics and Responsiveness of Teacher-Identified Students

Kathleen Lynne Lane

Vanderbilt University, Peabody College-328, Department of Special Education, MRL 302A, Nashville, TN 37203, kathleen.lane@ vanderbilt.edu

Joseph H. Wehby

Department of Special Education at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University

E. Jemma Robertson

Department of Special Education at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University

Leslie Ann Rogers

Department of Special Education at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University

In this article, the authors examined (a) the accuracy of teacher nominations in identifying (N = 178) high school students with externalizing, internalizing, comorbid, and typical behavior patterns, as well as students who were receiving special education services for high-incidence disabilities, (b) the level of treatment fidelity and access to reinforcement for the different student groups, and (c) the degree to which these different types of students responded to a schoolwide positive behavior support (SW-PBS) intervention program. Results indicated that despite receiving equal access to reinforcement, there were subtle differences regarding how different types of high school students responded to the SW-PBS. It appears that students with internalizing behavior problems were the most responsive, whereas students with comorbid concerns were the least responsive. Limitations and directions for future research are offered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
P. Caldarella, E. L. Young, M. J. Richardson, B. J. Young, and K. R. Young
Validation of the Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders in Middle and Junior High School
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, June 1, 2008; 16(2): 105 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
K. Lynne Lane, R. J. Parks, J. Robertson Kalberg, and E. W. Carter
Systematic Screening at the Middle School Level: Score Reliability and Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2007; 15(4): 209 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]