Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bridges Whaley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Placement Disruption in Treatment Foster Care

Dana K. Smith

Oregon Social Learning Center, 160 E. 4th Ave., Eugene, OR 97401-2426, danas @oslc.org

Elizabeth Stormshak

University of Oregon

Patricia Chamberlain

Oregon Social Learning Center's Treatment Foster Care (TFC) programs

Rachel Bridges Whaley

Oregon Social Learning Center

Rates of placement disruption in traditional and treatment foster care are reviewed. Contextual factors, individual child and caregiver characteristics, and risk factors thought to influence rates of placement disruption are explored. A model for treatment foster care is described, and data are presented on disruption rates for this program. The results indicated that the likelihood of placement disruption is two times higher during the first 6 months (17.8%) compared to the second 6 months (9.2%) of treatment.Taken together across the first and second 6 months of treatment, 23 of 90 youth (25.5%) experienced a placement disruption. Findings indicate that age and gender play a role in disruption, with older girls at the greatest risk for placement disruption. Limitations of the study, future directions,and implications for treatment are discussed.

Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 9, No. 3, 200-205 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106342660100900306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
E. M. Z. Farmer, D. Southerland, S. A. Mustillo, and B. J. Burns
Returning Home in Systems of Care: Rates, Predictors, and Stability
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, September 1, 2009; 17(3): 133 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
E. M. Z. Farmer, S. Mustillo, B. J. Burns, and E. W. Holden
Use and Predictors of Out-of-Home Placements Within Systems of Care
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, March 1, 2008; 16(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
J. M. Price, P. Chamberlain, J. Landsverk, J. B. Reid, L. D. Leve, and H. Laurent
Effects of a Foster Parent Training Intervention on Placement Changes of Children in Foster Care
Child Maltreat, February 1, 2008; 13(1): 64 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
D. K. Smith
Risk, Reinforcement, Retention in Treatment, and Reoffending for Boys and Girls in Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2004; 12(1): 38 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]